Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /home/virtualw/public_html/Archive/IndividualNews.php on line 12
VWN News: New research questions the effectiveness of drones in the fight against terrorism and highlights growing opposition to their use
Untitled Document
Not a member yet? Register for full benefits!

Username
Password
 New research questions the effectiveness of drones in the fight against terrorism and highlights growing opposition to their use

This story is from the category Artificial Intelligence
Printer Friendly Version
Email to a Friend (currently Down)

 

 

Date posted: 14/01/2014

Two new papers published in the latest volume of Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict explore the use of drones in military operations. The articles highlight increasing levels of disapproval of the use of drones in recent U.S. polls and suggest that drone warfare may be leading to an emphasis on tactical wins over long-term strategic victories.

Tom McCauley’s “U.S. Public Support for Drone Strikes against Asymmetric Enemies Abroad: Poll Trends in 2013” shows that, while a strong majority of U.S. citizens are in favor of using drones against terrorists in foreign lands, a small and increasing minority are against their use. In contrast, majorities in most countries are opposed to U.S. drone attacks against terrorists. McCauley notes, ‘Should drones’ unpopularity in the United States continue to increase, and their unpopularity in other countries persist, they may well become politically impractical, no matter how convenient and cost-effective the technology may be’.

Metin Gurcan’s “Drone Warfare and Contemporary Strategy Making: Does the Tail Wag the Dog?” argues that increasing use of drones in asymmetric conflict is reversing the dominance of strategy over tactics and may be undermining civilian control of the military. Gurcan notes that while there are a number of advantages to using drones, such as effectiveness at removing key targets and avoidance of friendly casualties, they may also increase the power of extremists amongst civilian populations by creating a siege mentality. He notes that breaking the power of extremists does not rest on the killing or capture of high-value targets, rather it depends on ‘removing their power to intimidate – something that drone strikes cannot do’. This article also reveals that concerns about military drones are salient not just for civilians, but even for army officers such as Gurcan.

The use of drones in U.S. military operations has increased rapidly in the last decade, with the US annual budget for drones growing from $1.9 billion in 2006 to $5.1 billion in 2011. This development has sparked considerable debate in countries that operate drones and in populaces living with them, and has resulted in a backlash in some audiences. The two papers published in DAC raise issues about military use of drones that will likely grow in years to come.

See the full Story via external site: www.alphagalileo.org



Most recent stories in this category (Artificial Intelligence):

03/03/2017: Application of Fuzzy Logic Teaches Drones to land on Moving Targets

02/03/2017: Poker-playing AI program first to beat pros at no-limit Texas hold 'em

05/02/2017: Google's driverless cars make progress

04/02/2017: Study Exposes Major Flaw in Turing Test

31/01/2017: Artificial intelligence uncovers new insight into biophysics of cancer

31/01/2017: Hungry penguins help keep smart car code safe

12/01/2017: First ever perched landing performed using machine learning algorithms

12/01/2017: AI takes on humans in marathon poker game



Warning: Unknown: write failed: Disk quota exceeded (122) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0